I have an email in my inbox from my mom informing me that my dad used to have coffee with Wade Wilson. Apparently, Wade used to show up at the Rockwall Dairy Queen on occasion to have coffee with the good old boys. It’s not surprising. By all accounts, Wade Wilson is a good guy.
His suspension came as quite a surprise. It is not often that a coach is suspended for five games for steroids. In fact, I didn’t even know there were league rules against a coach using steroids. But what is perhaps more disturbing are the number of Cowboy fans that want to get rid of him.
Personally, I can’t help but see the irony in the situation.
When you boil it all down, steroids are banned because they are unhealthy. Period. It isn’t an issue with ‘cheating’. After all, sports do not ban lifting weights, or taking vitamins. The fact that they improve physical performance doesn’t make it cheating, it is the fact that they are banned that makes it cheating, and they are banned because of the unhealthy side effects.
More to the point, they are banned because if one player takes them it could pressure other players to take them, and if all NFL players take them this would have a domino effect on college and high school players.
But, essentially, they are banned because they are unhealthy.
So, when you have a coach taking steroids because of a possible benefit to a condition (diabetes), there is some irony in the coach being suspended for his behavior.
After all, I don’t think players or other coaches are going to be pressured into taking steroids because a quarterbacks coach took them – he isn’t out there coaching the quarterbacks because of his physical dominance. Heck, if anything, coffee should be banned since staying awake at night could give a coach an edge!
So, when you ban a substance because it is unhealthy, then suspend someone for taking it to improve their health, that’s irony.
Don’t get me wrong, I understand why he was suspended, and why he was suspended for one more game than a player would have been suspended. Wade Wilson is both an example and a sacrificial lamb. He’s an example to the league showing that coaches will be held to a higher standard, and he’s a sacrificial lamb to congress who is keeping a sharp eye on steroids in sports. The suspension is Roger Goodell’s way of saying, “Hey, look, we are doing something about it.”
Personally, I don’t like examples. I think they are irrelevant. If the system you have in place to curb a behavior (whether it be substance abuse, criminal behavior, whatever) works then it will work. Period. It doesn’t need an example. And, if it doesn’t work, then no amount of examples will make it work.
An example simply punishes one person more than he deserves in hopes of preventing future behavior of those that might make a similar mistake. It highlights the system that is in place. If the system works, it would work regardless, the example is a way of speeding up the process. But, is that fair to the person? After all, they are essentially taking the punishment of other people onto their shoulders. Not exactly what I would call fair.
Our judicial system is made up of a jury of one’s peers and a judge who oftentimes has the latitude to choose mild-to-severe punishments. It is designed this way because no amount of putting words on paper can account for every situation, and not every situation is the same. Justice is fitting the appropriate punishment to the action.
The five-game suspension of Wade Wilson was not just.
Should he be suspended? Sure. It is against the rules, and he broke the rules. But take into account that he was taking steroids to deal with a life debilitating condition. The road of diabetes leads to blindness, amputation, and death. I think most people would do what they could to fight it.
Certainly, punishing it seems about as silly as punishing a terminally ill cancer patient for smoking pot to ease their discomfort. But, unfortunately, that’s the type of silly society we live in.